#Fastrawviewer nikon z7 free#

The sharpness is really down to technique and the lenses, not so much the camera. spending that money on travel will probably get you better landscape photos than buying another camera and wide angle zoom. You're looking at about $3,000 worth of gear. all matter a lot more, so even if a lens was a lot sharper, that wouldn't necessarily make better shots. Subject, composition, lighting, timing, etc. Sharpness is almost never the defining characteristic of a great photo. Half Dome isn't moving that fast, most of the time. That's the 6D's main failing.īut for landscape in particular? I'd consider that somewhat meaningless. That's mainly due to just having more options for where your focus point is - the 6D basically has one (incredible) focus points, and a meager handful of mediocre focus points.

If you do other kinds of work, yeah, the A7III blows the 6D away in terms of autofocus. I really, really doubt that you'll get a meaningfully different experience there. in terms of image quality regarding landscape photography?Īre you shooting mostly landscape? Honestly, you don't even need autofocus for landscape. I actually switched from a 6D to A7III (and later, to a Fuji X-T3.) I have a cheap polarizer and UV filter and I can't really see the difference, though I may be using the polarizer wrong. Does it make sense to buy a filter to reduce light pollution or will careful post processing produce the same result?įilters seem to be pretty much gimmick game, other than additional protection for your lens. To be sure I would rather control the output of the light directly rather than put another piece of glass in front of my lens, but would it work? Would it make more sense to simply make the fill brighter and use a faster shutter speed? Would it only make sense in a scenario where you have the exposure triangle set exactly as you want but cannot control the lighting?Īlso, graduated ND for sunset shots or shoot bracketed and correct exposure in post? Likewise for astro. If I feel like the background lighting is too strong, would it make sense to make the fill light brighter (still modified) and stop my exposure down with the ND? So I have a ring of LED's around the ceiling in my room, and want a dim purple background light effect with spot fill.

So I know ND filters are great for controlling your exposure for video, and can really help nail exposure on a long exposure, but I wanted to see if y'all have any tips I may not have considered. See here for guidelines.)įinally a friendly reminder to share your work with our community in r/photographs ! (Remember, when asking for purchase advice please be specific about how much you can spend.

#Fastrawviewer nikon z7 free#

If after reviewing this information you have any specific questions, please feel free to post a comment below. What's a 'point and shoot' camera? What's a DSLR? What's a 'mirrorless' camera? What's the difference?ĭo I need a good camera to take good photos? Please see the following sections of the FAQ to get started: Our FAQ has several extensive sections to help you determine what best fits your needs and your budget. Many people come here for recommendations on what equipment to buy. Here's an informative video explaining the Exposure Triangle. Want to start learning? Check out r/photoclass2021 (or r/photoclass for old lessons). Chances are, you'll find your answer there, or at least a starting point in order to ask more informed questions. No question is too small, nor too stupid.įirst and foremost, check out our extensive FAQ. This is the place to ask any questions you may have about photography.